RouhaniTweet
“Hitler urges Jews to support Zyklon B.”
The only difference between then and now is timing. The Nazis moved with incredible speed and technology.  One of the most technologically advanced countries on earth, Nazi Germany worked with laser focus to build its war machine and achieve its global goals.  Islamic supremacists, on the other hand, have all the time in the world. It doesn’t matter the date or time, or century for that matter; the book never changes, the goal never changes. That and the Muslim world is hardly the most advanced at anything — except, of course, savagery and propaganda.
It is striking how little Obama thinks of Jewish leadership. What quislings he must think they are — cowardly, and so will just go along.
This reminds me of the Gestapo urging the Jews to go quietly onto the trains.  And the Third Reich demanded and received close cooperation from Jewish leadership — the Jewish Councils (Kapos). Don’t misunderstand me: I am sure they could have done little that might have made a difference, but even so –  resist.
Obama has consistently snubbed AIPAC throughout his presidency, instead giving the Muslim-funded J Street the respect that AIPAC had earned and enjoyed for decades. J Street, an anti-Israel organization masquerading as a pro-Jewish group, was formed by antisemites like George Soros in order to weaken AIPAC.
Obama’s contempt for the Jews appears to have reached a new low.  He now demands that Jewish leadership sign off on the second holocaust and sell it to the yehudim.
Obama has played this dirty game with AIPAC before. When Obama bumbled his way through his Syrian misadventure, he demanded that the Jews carry water for him. Caroline Glick wrote this at the time:
US President Barack Obama’s rapidly changing positions on Syria have produced many odd spectacles.One of odder ones was the sight of hundreds of lobbyists from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee [AIPAC] fanning out on Capitol Hill to lobby members of the House and Senate to support Obama’s plan to launch what Secretary of State John Kerry called “unbelievably small” air strikes against empty regime controlled buildings in Syria. AIPAC officials claimed they were doing this because the air strikes would help Israel.
[...]
Obama wanted to launch the unbelievably small strikes to prove that he wasn’t lying when he said that Syria would cross a red line if it used chemical weapons. So if the strikes were going to harm the US and Israel, why did AIPAC dispatch its lobbyists to Capitol Hill to lobby infavor of them? Because Obama made them.
Obama ordered AIPAC to go to Capitol Hill to lobby for the Syria strikes. He did so knowing that its involvement would weaken public support for AIPAC and Israel. Both would be widely perceived as pushing the US to send military forces into harm’s way to defend Israel.
Then, with hundreds of AIPAC lobbyist racing from one Congressional office to the next, Obama left them in a lurch. He announced he was cutting a deal with Russia and had decided not to attack Syria after all.
What did AIPAC get for its self-defeating efforts on Obama’s behalf? Obama is now courting Iranian President Hassan Rouhani in the hopes of making a deal that Iran will use as cover for completing its nuclear weapons program.
AIPAC has been advocating for sanctions for years. This is unconscionable. And yes, I fear what AIPAC and the many in jewicidal lay leadership will do.
“Obama urges Jewish leaders not to back Iran sanctions,” The Times of Israel, January 16, 2014
WASHINGTON — Two top Obama administration officials urged Jewish groups not to back new Iran sanctions, calling them “dangerous.”
The officials — from the White House national security team and the Treasury Department — spoke Wednesday with Jewish leaders in a call convened by the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations.
 The officials outlined the terms of the interim six-month sanctions-for-nuclear rollback relief set to begin next week, saying it allows Iran no more than $7 billion of relief from the $100 billion that sanctions are costing the country. They also said the agreement increases inspections and adds safeguards against any advancement in Iran’s nuclear capability.
 A number of the Jewish participants pressed the government officials on why the Obama administration opposes new sanctions under consideration in Congress, noting that the sanctions would only go into effect should Iran renege.
The officials said that even with the precaution, the legislation would be perceived by Iran and US partners negotiating the deal as creating new sanctions, which would violate the terms of the interim agreement and lead to the collapse of the international coalition that has drawn Iran to talks through existing sanctions. The officials called the new sanctions “dangerous.”
 A number of pro-Israel groups, led by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, are lobbying intensively for the new sanctions. The US House of Representatives last year passed the sanctions with a veto-proof majority, and 59 senators have sponsored the Senate version, shy of the 67 that would vitiate President Obama’s promised veto. Backers of the new sanctions say they would strengthen the hand of the six world powers at the talks, including the United States.
 The officials walked back previous statements by Obama administration officials that called on supporters of sanctions to admit they would lead to war, saying that both sides are acting in good faith, but also urging those opposing the sanctions to defer to the judgment of negotiators.
 They dismissed concerns raised by callers who noted visits to Tehran in recent weeks by Russian and other foreign officials, saying that such visits were routine and rarely led to actual business deals. The officials said the final status deal would not recognize an Iranian right to uranium enrichment, but that Iran likely would be allowed to continue enriching uranium at low levels.